eco Beginner Tutorial/How-to

Building Fault-Tolerant S3

calendar_month Feb 11, 2026 schedule 47 min read visibility 58 views
Создание отказоустойчивого S3-совместимого хранилища на VPS/Dedicated: Полное руководство по MinIO
info

Need a server for this guide? We offer dedicated servers and VPS in 50+ countries with instant setup.

Need a server for this guide?

Deploy a VPS or dedicated server in minutes.

Building a Fault-Tolerant S3-Compatible Storage on VPS/Dedicated: A Complete Guide to MinIO

TL;DR

  • MinIO is a powerful S3-compatible object storage, ideal for deployment on your own VPS or dedicated servers, offering full control and significant savings compared to cloud providers.
  • Fault tolerance is achieved through erasure coding and replication, ensuring data integrity even if multiple disks or nodes in the cluster fail.
  • The choice between VPS and Dedicated depends on scale, budget, and performance requirements; for serious production workloads, dedicated servers with NVMe/SSD are preferable.
  • Savings on cloud costs can be enormous, especially for projects with large storage volumes and frequent access, but require investment in administration and hardware.
  • Proper architecture and monitoring are critical for stable operation and scaling: use Prometheus, Grafana, and centralized logging.
  • MinIO security is ensured through HTTPS, IAM, KMS, and strict network access configuration.
  • MinIO deployment in 2026 often involves the use of containerization (Docker, Kubernetes) to simplify management and scaling.

Introduction

Diagram: Introduction
Diagram: Introduction

In the rapidly evolving digital world of 2026, where data volumes are growing exponentially and demands for their availability and preservation are becoming increasingly stringent, the issue of reliable and cost-effective information storage is more critical than ever. Cloud providers such as AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Azure Blob Storage offer convenient and scalable solutions, but their cost can quickly become prohibitive for projects with large data volumes or specific traffic requirements. This is where alternative approaches come into play, allowing you to regain control over your infrastructure and optimize costs.

This article is dedicated to building a fault-tolerant S3-compatible object storage based on MinIO, deployed on your own VPS or dedicated servers. We will consider MinIO not just as a replacement for cloud services, but as a powerful tool capable of providing high availability, scalability, and security, while remaining under the full control of your team. Such a solution is ideal for DevOps engineers striving to optimize infrastructure, Backend developers needing reliable storage for their applications, SaaS project founders looking for ways to reduce operational costs, system administrators building fault-tolerant systems, and startup CTOs balancing innovation and budget.

In 2026, when microservice architecture and serverless functions have become the standard, and data is a key asset for any business, choosing the right data storage determines project success. MinIO, with its lightweight architecture, high performance, and full S3 compatibility, offers a unique combination of flexibility and control. It allows you to build your own storage "cloud" that will fully meet your security, performance, and cost requirements, avoiding vendor lock-in traps and unpredictable cloud bills.

This article will help you navigate from understanding the basic principles to practical deployment and operation of a fault-tolerant MinIO cluster, sharing specific examples, configurations, and recommendations based on real-world experience. We will analyze why MinIO is an optimal choice for many scenarios, what problems it solves, and how to avoid common mistakes during its implementation.

Key Criteria and Selection Factors for Fault-Tolerant Storage

Diagram: Key Criteria and Selection Factors for Fault-Tolerant Storage
Diagram: Key Criteria and Selection Factors for Fault-Tolerant Storage

Choosing and designing fault-tolerant object storage is a multifaceted process that requires considering many factors. Each of them plays a critical role in determining the suitability of a solution for a specific project. In 2026, these criteria have become even more relevant as data requirements continuously grow.

1. Fault Tolerance and Availability

This is the cornerstone of any serious storage. Fault tolerance means the system's ability to continue functioning even if individual components (disks, servers, network devices) fail. Availability is measured by the percentage of time data is available for reading and writing. For object storage, this is typically achieved through:

  • Data Redundancy: Using erasure coding (error correction coding) or replication. MinIO actively uses erasure coding for efficient disk space utilization and high fault tolerance. For example, with an EC:N/2 configuration, where N is the number of disks, the system can withstand the failure of up to N/2 - 1 disks.
  • Distributed Architecture: Spreading data and services across multiple nodes or servers. This prevents a single point of failure at the server level.
  • Self-healing Mechanisms: The system's ability to automatically detect failures and restore redundant data without manual intervention.

How to evaluate: Look at the minimum number of nodes/disks that can fail without data loss, as well as the recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO).

2. Scalability

Storage should easily scale both in volume and performance. In 2026, projects can start with terabytes and quickly grow to petabytes. Scalability can be:

  • Horizontal Scaling: Adding new servers/nodes to increase capacity and performance. MinIO in distributed mode is designed for horizontal scaling.
  • Vertical Scaling: Increasing resources (disks, CPU, RAM) on existing servers. Less preferable for large volumes.

How to evaluate: Ease of adding new nodes, absence of limits on maximum volume/number of objects, linear performance growth with added resources.

3. S3 Compatibility

The S3 API standard from Amazon Web Services has become the de facto standard for object storage. S3 compatibility means that your storage can be used with any tools, SDKs, and applications developed for AWS S3, without the need for code modification. This significantly simplifies migration, integration, and development.

How to evaluate: Check for support of all major S3 operations (PutObject, GetObject, ListBuckets, DeleteObject, Multi-part Upload, Versioning, Lifecycle Policies, IAM). MinIO is known for its high degree of S3 compatibility.

4. Performance

Data read and write speed is critical for many applications. Performance depends on:

  • Disk type: NVMe SSD > SATA SSD > HDD. In 2026, NVMe is becoming the standard for high-performance storage.
  • Network bandwidth: Network speed between cluster nodes and between clients and the cluster. For distributed systems, 10GbE or higher is desirable.
  • Storage architecture: Efficiency of the internal mechanism for request processing and data distribution.

How to evaluate: Measuring IOPS (input/output operations per second) and throughput (MB/s, GB/s) for various object sizes and access patterns.

5. Security

Protecting data from unauthorized access, loss, or damage is a paramount task.

  • Encryption: Data at rest (encryption at rest) and in transit (encryption in transit - HTTPS/TLS). MinIO supports both options, including KMS integration.
  • Access management: Support for IAM (Identity and Access Management) to create users, groups, and access policies, similar to AWS IAM.
  • Network isolation: Configuration of firewalls, VPNs, private networks to restrict access to storage.
  • Auditing and logging: Recording all data access operations for monitoring and compliance with regulatory requirements.

How to evaluate: Presence of all the above features, as well as regular security audits and updates.

6. Cost

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) includes not only direct costs for hardware/VPS but also operational expenses.

  • Infrastructure: Cost of VPS or dedicated servers, disks, network equipment.
  • Traffic: Inbound and outbound traffic. This is often a hidden but very significant cost for cloud providers.
  • Administration: Personnel costs for deploying, maintaining, and scaling the storage.
  • Electricity and cooling: For dedicated servers in your own data center.

How to evaluate: Pricing transparency, ability to forecast expenses, TCO comparison with cloud counterparts over 3-5 years.

7. Manageability & Monitoring

The system should be easily manageable and provide comprehensive metrics for monitoring its status and performance.

  • Management interface: Availability of a user-friendly UI (MinIO Console) and CLI (mc).
  • API: Capability for programmatic management.
  • Metrics: Integration with monitoring systems (Prometheus, Grafana) for tracking CPU, RAM, disk, network utilization, as well as specific MinIO metrics (IOPS, throughput, bucket status, erasure coding).
  • Logging: Centralized event logging for debugging and auditing.

How to evaluate: Ease of setup, quality of documentation, availability of ready-made integrations with popular tools.

8. Ecosystem Compatibility

How easily does the storage integrate with other components of your infrastructure (CI/CD, Kubernetes, Spark, Kafka, ETL tools)?

How to evaluate: Support for standard protocols, availability of connectors and plugins for popular tools.

Comparative Table of Object Storage Solutions (relevant for 2026)

Diagram: Comparative Table of Object Storage Solutions (relevant for 2026)
Diagram: Comparative Table of Object Storage Solutions (relevant for 2026)

To make an informed decision, it is important to compare MinIO with other popular options. The table below presents key characteristics and approximate cost estimates, relevant for 2026, taking into account the projected development of technologies and pricing policies.

Criterion MinIO (Self-Hosted) AWS S3 (Standard) Google Cloud Storage (Standard) Ceph (Self-Hosted) Local Filesystem/NFS
Deployment Type VPS/Dedicated Server, Kubernetes Public Cloud Public Cloud Dedicated Server, Kubernetes VPS/Dedicated Server
S3 Compatibility Full Native Via S3 API Gateway Via RGW (radosgw) No (File API)
Fault Tolerance High (Erasure Coding) Very High (Multi-zone) Very High (Multi-zone) High (Replication/EC) Low (depends on RAID/replication)
Scalability Horizontal (easy) Virtually Infinite Virtually Infinite Horizontal (complex) Limited by node/NFS
Performance (typical) High (close to local) Very High Very High High (with proper configuration) High (local disk speed)
Storage Cost (per 1 TB/month, 2026 forecast) ~5-15 USD (incl. TCO) ~20-25 USD ~20-25 USD ~10-20 USD (incl. TCO) ~3-10 USD (incl. TCO)
Egress Traffic Cost (per 1 TB, 2026 forecast) ~0-10 USD (depends on VPS/Dedicated provider) ~80-100 USD (regional) ~80-100 USD (regional) ~0-10 USD (depends on provider) ~0-10 USD (depends on provider)
Deployment Complexity Medium Low (configuration) Low (configuration) High Low
Manageability Medium (UI, CLI, API) Low (console, CLI, API) Low (console, CLI, API) High (CLI, Dashboard) Low (OS tools)
Control over Data/Infrastructure Full Limited Limited Full Full
Entry Barrier (starting) 1-2 VPS (from 50 USD/month) Virtually 0 USD (pay-as-you-go) Virtually 0 USD (pay-as-you-go) Minimum 3 Dedicated (from 300 USD/month) 1 VPS (from 10 USD/month)

Note: "TCO" (Total Cost of Ownership) includes the cost of hardware/hosting, traffic, and administrative labor costs. Prices are approximate forecasts for 2026 and may vary depending on region, provider, and volume.

Detailed Overview of MinIO and Alternatives

Diagram: Detailed Overview of MinIO and Alternatives
Diagram: Detailed Overview of MinIO and Alternatives

Now, let's delve into the specifics of each solution to better understand their strengths and weaknesses, as well as the scenarios for which they are most suitable.

1. MinIO (Self-Hosted)

MinIO is a high-performance, open-source, distributed object storage written in Go, fully compatible with the Amazon S3 API. It is designed to run on standard hardware and cloud environments, making it an ideal candidate for deployment on VPS or dedicated servers. In 2026, MinIO is a mature product with an extensive community and active development.

  • Pros:
    • Full S3-compatibility: Ensures easy migration and integration with existing S3-compatible tools and applications.
    • High Performance: Optimized for NVMe drives and modern network infrastructure, capable of achieving speeds up to 100 Gbit/s on a single node.
    • Fault Tolerance via Erasure Coding: Efficiently uses disk space, ensuring data integrity even if up to half of the disks or nodes in a cluster fail.
    • Horizontal Scalability: Easily expands by adding new nodes to the cluster without downtime.
    • Data Control: You fully own the infrastructure and data, which is critical for regulatory compliance and security.
    • Cost-Effectiveness: Significantly cheaper than cloud alternatives for large storage volumes and intensive traffic, especially egress.
    • Lightweight: The MinIO binary file is only a few tens of megabytes, consuming few resources.
    • Active Development and Community: Constant updates, new features, good documentation.
  • Cons:
    • Requires Administration: Knowledge and resources are needed for deployment, monitoring, and support.
    • Self-Managed HA: High availability depends on your infrastructure (VPS/Dedicated) and its reliability.
    • No Vendor SLA: You bear full responsibility for operational uptime.
    • Complexity of Initial Setup: A well-thought-out architecture is required to ensure maximum fault tolerance and performance.
  • Best Suited For:
    • SaaS projects with large volumes of user data (images, videos, documents).
    • Companies requiring full S3-compatibility but without vendor lock-in to a specific cloud provider.
    • Developers creating local environments for testing S3-compatible applications.
    • Media companies for content storage and delivery.
    • Projects with high performance and low latency requirements.
    • Companies aiming to optimize storage and traffic costs.
  • Use Cases: Backup storage, logging, static website hosting, data storage for AI/ML models, media streaming, file-sharing services.

2. AWS S3 (Standard)

Amazon S3 is the benchmark for object storage in the cloud. It is a fully managed service offering unparalleled scalability, reliability, and availability. In 2026, it continues to dominate the market, constantly expanding its functionality.

  • Pros:
    • Maximum Reliability and Availability: Objects are stored redundantly across multiple availability zones, ensuring 99.999999999% durability.
    • Infinite Scalability: No need to worry about capacity or performance.
    • Fully Managed: AWS handles all infrastructure, update, and maintenance concerns.
    • Extensive Ecosystem: Deep integration with other AWS services (Lambda, EC2, CloudFront, Athena, etc.).
    • Numerous Features: Versioning, lifecycle policies, replication, encryption, static website hosting, and much more.
    • Global Reach: Availability in numerous regions worldwide.
  • Cons:
    • High Cost: Especially with large storage volumes and intensive egress traffic. Opaque pricing policy with many hidden fees.
    • Vendor Lock-in: Deep integration with AWS can make migration to other platforms difficult.
    • Limited Control: You do not manage the underlying infrastructure, which can be an issue for specific security or performance requirements.
    • Complexity of Cost Prediction: Bills can be unpredictable due to many factors (requests, traffic, storage, storage classes).
  • Best Suited For:
    • Early-stage startups needing rapid development without infrastructure concerns.
    • Companies already deeply integrated into the AWS ecosystem.
    • Projects with unpredictable growth requiring instant scaling.
    • Companies lacking resources for self-administering storage.
    • Projects with high requirements for global availability and content distribution.

3. Google Cloud Storage (Standard)

Google Cloud Storage (GCS) is another leading cloud object storage service, offering capabilities similar to AWS S3 with some differences in pricing policy and integration with the Google Cloud ecosystem. It also provides various storage classes and features.

  • Pros:
    • Similar Reliability and Scalability: High durability and availability, global coverage.
    • Fully Managed Service: Reduces operational overhead.
    • Google Cloud Integration: Good compatibility with BigQuery, Dataflow, Kubernetes Engine, and other Google services.
    • S3-compatible API: Supports S3 API via its own gateway, simplifying migration.
    • Efficient Pricing: Often more competitive for certain usage patterns, especially for infrequent access.
  • Cons:
    • High Egress Traffic Costs: Like AWS, this is a significant expense.
    • Vendor Lock-in: Tied to the Google Cloud ecosystem.
    • Less Popular S3-compatibility: Although the S3 API is supported, the native ecosystem is oriented towards its own GCS API, which can create nuances.
    • Potentially More Complex for Migration: If you already use S3-oriented tools, GCS might require more adaptation.
  • Best Suited For:
    • Companies already using Google Cloud Platform for other services.
    • Projects actively using Big Data and analytics with Google tools.
    • Startups looking for an alternative to AWS S3 with potentially more favorable storage rates or specific storage classes.

4. Ceph (Self-Hosted)

Ceph is an open-source, distributed data storage system designed to provide high performance, reliability, and scalability. It offers block storage (RBD), file storage (CephFS), and object storage (RADOS Gateway, RGW) interfaces, compatible with S3 and Swift APIs. Ceph requires significant resources and expertise for deployment and management.

  • Pros:
    • Versatility: Provides block, file, and object storage in a single system.
    • High Scalability: Can scale up to petabytes and exabytes.
    • Fault Tolerance: Uses replication or erasure coding to ensure data integrity.
    • Full Control: You fully control the infrastructure and data.
    • Open Source: Flexibility and no licensing fees.
  • Cons:
    • High Complexity: Deploying and administering Ceph requires deep knowledge and experience; it is not a task for a single DevOps engineer.
    • Hardware Requirements: High requirements for the number of servers (minimum 3 for HA), disks, and network.
    • Initial Investment: Significant hardware costs for a minimally fault-tolerant configuration.
    • Performance: May be lower than MinIO for pure S3 operations on the same hardware due to a more complex architecture.
  • Best Suited For:
    • Large enterprises and cloud providers building their own cloud.
    • Projects requiring not only object but also block/file storage within a single system.
    • Organizations with a large staff of experienced system engineers.

5. Local Filesystem / NFS (Network File System)

Using a local filesystem or NFS is a basic approach to data storage. In 2026, it is still relevant for certain, less critical scenarios but is rarely used for building fault-tolerant object storage.

  • Pros:
    • Simplicity: Easy to set up and use.
    • High Performance: A local disk provides minimal latency. NFS can be quite fast on a local network.
    • Low Cost: Uses existing disks and network resources.
    • Full Control: You fully manage the file system.
  • Cons:
    • Lack of S3-compatibility: Requires rewriting application code that uses the S3 API.
    • Low Fault Tolerance: A local file system is a single point of failure. NFS can also be prone to server failures.
    • Poor Scalability: Extremely difficult to scale in terms of volume and performance.
    • Lack of Object Storage Features: No versioning, lifecycle policies, object metadata, IAM, etc.
    • Ineffective for a Large Number of Small Files: Can lead to inode issues and file system performance problems.
  • Best Suited For:
    • Small projects with limited budgets and low fault tolerance requirements.
    • Development and testing where S3-compatibility is not critical.
    • Storage of temporary files or cache.
    • Systems where data is already processed as files and there is no need for object storage.

As can be seen, MinIO strikes a golden mean between the simplicity of local solutions and the power, yet expense, of cloud giants, as well as the complexity of Ceph. This makes it an ideal choice for most startups and medium-sized companies aiming for control and cost savings.

Practical Tips and Recommendations for MinIO Deployment

Diagram: Practical Tips and Recommendations for MinIO Deployment
Diagram: Practical Tips and Recommendations for MinIO Deployment

Deploying a fault-tolerant MinIO cluster requires careful planning and precise execution. Here, we will cover step-by-step instructions and configurations for creating reliable storage.

1. Infrastructure Selection and Preparation (VPS/Dedicated)

VPS (Virtual Private Server): Suitable for small to medium-sized projects, test environments. Choose providers with fast SSD/NVMe disks and stable networks. Ensure that VPS instances are located in different data centers or availability zones of the provider for maximum fault tolerance.

Dedicated Server: The optimal choice for production workloads, large data volumes, and high performance. Servers with multiple NVMe disks (minimum 4 for erasure coding) and 10GbE network cards are preferred. Distribute servers across different racks or even data centers, if possible.

Minimum cluster requirements (2026):

  • Number of nodes: Minimum 4 nodes for distributed MinIO with erasure coding. This allows tolerating the failure of up to 2 nodes or disks (with EC:N/2). For 8 nodes, it will tolerate the failure of 4 nodes.
  • CPU: 4-8 vCPU per node (for VPS), 8+ physical cores per node (for Dedicated).
  • RAM: 8-16 GB per node (for VPS), 32+ GB per node (for Dedicated).
  • Disks: Minimum 4 NVMe/SSD disks on each node for maximum performance and load distribution. Use raw devices or block devices, without formatting them into file systems, so that MinIO can manage them directly.
  • Network: 1 GbE minimum, 10 GbE or 25 GbE for high-performance clusters.

OS Preparation (Ubuntu 24.04 LTS):


# Обновление системы
sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade -y

# Установка необходимых пакетов (если не установлены)
sudo apt install -y curl wget systemd-timesyncd

# Настройка NTP для синхронизации времени (критично для распределенных систем)
sudo timedatectl set-ntp true

# Отключение SWAP (рекомендуется для MinIO для предсказуемой производительности)
sudo swapoff -a
sudo sed -i '/ swap / s/^\(.\)$/#\1/g' /etc/fstab

# Настройка файервола (открыть порты MinIO и SSH)
sudo ufw allow ssh
sudo ufw allow 9000/tcp # MinIO API
sudo ufw allow 9001/tcp # MinIO Console (если включена)
sudo ufw enable

2. MinIO Server Installation

We will install MinIO as a system service.


# Скачивание MinIO бинарника
wget https://dl.min.io/server/minio/release/linux-amd64/minio -O /usr/local/bin/minio

# Предоставление прав на выполнение
sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/minio

# Создание директорий для данных и конфигурации
sudo mkdir -p /mnt/data{1..4} # Создаем директории для 4 дисков на каждом узле
sudo mkdir -p /etc/minio
sudo chown -R minio:minio /mnt/data # Создайте пользователя minio:minio
sudo chown -R minio:minio /etc/minio

Creating the configuration file /etc/minio/minio.env:


MINIO_ROOT_USER="minioadmin"
MINIO_ROOT_PASSWORD="supersecretpassword" # Смените на сложный пароль!
MINIO_SERVER_URL="http://minio.yourdomain.com:9000" # Или IP первого узла
# Если вы используете несколько узлов, укажите их IP или доменные имена
# Пример для 4 узлов:
# MINIO_VOLUMES="http://node1.yourdomain.com/mnt/data{1..4} http://node2.yourdomain.com/mnt/data{1..4} http://node3.yourdomain.com/mnt/data{1..4} http://node4.yourdomain.com/mnt/data{1..4}"
# Для одного узла (но это не отказоустойчиво):
# MINIO_VOLUMES="/mnt/data{1..4}"

Example MINIO_VOLUMES for 4 nodes with 4 disks each:

Assume you have 4 nodes: node1.yourdomain.com, node2.yourdomain.com, node3.yourdomain.com, node4.yourdomain.com.


MINIO_VOLUMES="http://node1.yourdomain.com:9000/mnt/data{1..4} \
               http://node2.yourdomain.com:9000/mnt/data{1..4} \
               http://node3.yourdomain.com:9000/mnt/data{1..4} \
               http://node4.yourdomain.com:9000/mnt/data{1..4}"

Creating systemd service /etc/systemd/system/minio.service:


[Unit]
Description=MinIO Object Storage Server
Documentation=https://docs.min.io
Wants=network-online.target
After=network-online.target

[Service]
ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/minio server $MINIO_VOLUMES --console-address ":9001"
EnvironmentFile=/etc/minio/minio.env
User=minio
Group=minio
ProtectProc=full
AmbientCapabilities=CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE
ReadWritePaths=/mnt/data
NoNewPrivileges=true
PrivateTmp=true
PrivateDevices=true
ProtectSystem=full
ProtectHome=true
CapabilityBoundingSet=CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE
LimitNOFILE=65536
LimitNPROC=infinity
LimitCORE=infinity
TimeoutStopSec=30
Restart=on-failure
RestartSec=5

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

Starting and enabling the service:


sudo systemctl daemon-reload
sudo systemctl enable minio
sudo systemctl start minio
sudo systemctl status minio

Repeat these steps on each cluster node. Ensure that all nodes can access each other via the specified IPs/domain names on port 9000.

3. DNS and SSL/TLS Configuration

To access MinIO by domain name and ensure security, use DNS and SSL/TLS. In 2026, HTTPS is a mandatory standard.

  • DNS: Create an A-record for your domain (e.g., minio.yourdomain.com) pointing to the IP address of one of the nodes or to the IP address of a load balancer, if you are using one. For distributed MinIO, Round Robin DNS or a hardware/software load balancer (HAProxy, Nginx) is recommended.
  • SSL/TLS (Let's Encrypt + Nginx/HAProxy):

    Install Nginx as a reverse proxy in front of MinIO on each node or on a separate node/balancer.

    
    sudo apt install -y nginx certbot python3-certbot-nginx
    

    Example Nginx configuration (/etc/nginx/sites-available/minio.conf):

    
    server {
        listen 80;
        listen [::]:80;
        server_name minio.yourdomain.com;
        return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
    }
    
    server {
        listen 443 ssl http2;
        listen [::]:443 ssl http2;
        server_name minio.yourdomain.com;
    
        ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/minio.yourdomain.com/fullchain.pem;
        ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/minio.yourdomain.com/privkey.pem;
        ssl_trusted_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/minio.yourdomain.com/chain.pem;
    
        ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3;
        ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;
        ssl_ciphers "EECDH+AESGCM:EDH+AESGCM:AES256+EECDH:AES256+EDH";
        ssl_ecdh_curve secp384r1;
        ssl_session_cache shared:SSL:10m;
        ssl_session_tickets off;
        ssl_stapling on;
        ssl_stapling_verify on;
        resolver 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 valid=300s;
        resolver_timeout 5s;
        add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload";
        add_header X-Frame-Options DENY;
        add_header X-Content-Type-Options nosniff;
        add_header X-XSS-Protection "1; mode=block";
    
        location / {
            proxy_set_header Host $http_host;
            proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
            proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
            proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
    
            proxy_connect_timeout 300;
            proxy_send_timeout 300;
            proxy_read_timeout 300;
            send_timeout 300;
    
            # Для MinIO API
            proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:9000; # Или IP локального MinIO
            proxy_http_version 1.1;
            proxy_buffering off;
            proxy_request_buffering off;
        }
    
        location /minio/ui { # Для консоли MinIO
            proxy_set_header Host $http_host;
            proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
            proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
            proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
    
            proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:9001; # Или IP локальной консоли MinIO
            proxy_http_version 1.1;
            proxy_buffering off;
            proxy_request_buffering off;
        }
    }
    
    
    # Активация конфигурации Nginx
    sudo ln -s /etc/nginx/sites-available/minio.conf /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/
    sudo nginx -t
    sudo systemctl restart nginx
    
    # Получение SSL-сертификата с Let's Encrypt
    sudo certbot --nginx -d minio.yourdomain.com
    

    After obtaining the certificate, Nginx will automatically update the configuration. Make sure that MINIO_SERVER_URL in minio.env now points to an HTTPS address if you are using an external load balancer that terminates SSL. If Nginx is running on the same node as MinIO, MinIO can continue to listen on HTTP, and Nginx will terminate SSL.

    If you want MinIO itself to terminate SSL, you need to place the certificates in /root/.minio/certs or /home/minio/.minio/certs and configure MINIO_SERVER_URL to HTTPS. However, SSL is most often terminated at the load balancer or proxy.

4. User and Policy Management (IAM)

MinIO has a built-in IAM system compatible with AWS IAM. Use the mc CLI for management.


# Установка mc CLI
wget https://dl.min.io/client/mc/release/linux-amd64/mc -O /usr/local/bin/mc
sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/mc

# Добавление хоста MinIO
mc alias set myminio https://minio.yourdomain.com minioadmin supersecretpassword

# Создание нового пользователя
mc admin user add myminio appuser strongpassword123

# Создание политики доступа (например, только чтение для бакета 'mybucket')
# Создайте файл policy.json
cat <<EOF > read-only-policy.json
{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": [
                "s3:GetObject",
                "s3:ListBucket"
            ],
            "Resource": [
                "arn:aws:s3:::mybucket",
                "arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/"
            ]
        }
    ]
}
EOF

# Добавление политики
mc admin policy add myminio readonlypolicy read-only-policy.json

# Привязка политики к пользователю
mc admin policy set myminio readonlypolicy user=appuser

# Просмотр пользователей и политик
mc admin user list myminio
mc admin policy list myminio

5. Monitoring and Logging

Monitoring is crucial for stable MinIO operation. MinIO exports metrics in Prometheus format.

  • Prometheus + Grafana: Deploy Prometheus for metric collection and Grafana for visualization. MinIO by default exports metrics on port 9000 at the path /minio/v2/metrics/cluster.
  • Logrotate: Configure MinIO log rotation.
  • Centralized logging: Send MinIO logs to a centralized system (ELK Stack, Loki, Graylog) for easy analysis and error searching.

6. Backup and Recovery

While MinIO provides fault tolerance, it does not replace backup. Use mc mirror or third-party tools to back up data to another location (e.g., to the cloud or another MinIO cluster).


# Зеркалирование бакета mybucket на локальный диск
mc mirror myminio/mybucket /mnt/backup/mybucket

# Зеркалирование бакета на другой MinIO кластер
mc mirror myminio/mybucket anotherminio/mybucket

7. MinIO Updates

Regularly update MinIO to the latest versions to get new features, bug fixes, and security improvements.


# Скачивание новой версии
wget https://dl.min.io/server/minio/release/linux-amd64/minio -O /tmp/minio_new

# Замена бинарника
sudo systemctl stop minio
sudo mv /tmp/minio_new /usr/local/bin/minio
sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/minio
sudo systemctl start minio

For a cluster, this should be done sequentially, node by node, to avoid downtime. MinIO supports "rolling upgrades".

8. Deployment Automation (Ansible/Terraform)

For production environments, use automation tools such as Ansible for node configuration and MinIO deployment, and Terraform for managing VPS/Dedicated server infrastructure. This will significantly reduce the likelihood of errors and speed up scaling.

Common Mistakes When Implementing MinIO

Diagram: Common Mistakes When Implementing MinIO
Diagram: Common Mistakes When Implementing MinIO

Even experienced engineers can make mistakes when working with new technologies. Here is a list of the most common pitfalls when deploying and operating MinIO, and how to avoid them.

1. Using an Insufficient Number of Nodes/Disks for Erasure Coding

Mistake: Deploying MinIO in distributed mode on fewer than 4 nodes/disks, or using too low an Erasure Coding ratio (e.g., EC:N/1). Some mistakenly believe that 2 nodes are sufficient for "fault tolerance".

Consequences: Data loss or storage unavailability if even one node or several disks fail. MinIO requires a minimum of 4 disks (or nodes with disks) to activate distributed mode with Erasure Coding. The recommended EC ratio is N/2, which means the system can withstand the failure of up to N/2 - 1 disks/nodes without data loss.

How to avoid: Always plan for a minimum of 4 nodes for a production cluster. Use the N/2 formula to determine the maximum number of failures the cluster can withstand. For example, with 8 nodes, MinIO can withstand up to 3 simultaneous node/disk failures.

2. Lack of Time Synchronization (NTP) Between Nodes

Mistake: Time synchronization is not configured between MinIO cluster nodes.

Consequences: Time discrepancies can lead to serious data consistency issues, inability for erasure coding to function correctly, errors during object write/read operations, and difficulties with diagnostics. In distributed systems, time is a critically important factor for ordering events.

How to avoid: Ensure that an NTP client (e.g., systemd-timesyncd or ntpd) is installed and configured on all nodes, and that all nodes synchronize with a reliable time source. Regularly check the synchronization status.


timedatectl status # Check NTP status

3. Using Filesystems on Top of Block Devices for MinIO Data

Mistake: Formatting disks with ext4, XFS, etc., then mounting them and pointing MinIO to these mount points.

Consequences: MinIO is designed for direct access to block devices or directories that it manages as "raw". Using standard filesystems adds an extra layer of abstraction, which can lead to reduced performance, inefficient disk space utilization, and potential data consistency issues, especially under high loads or failures. MinIO will not be able to fully control the placement of data and metadata.

How to avoid: Directly specify paths to directories for MinIO that are located on separate block devices (e.g., /mnt/data1, /mnt/data2). Allow MinIO to manage these directories and disks without prior formatting into traditional file systems. MinIO uses its own internal structure for object storage.

4. Ignoring Security and Access

Mistake: Using default or weak credentials (minioadmin:minioadmin), lack of HTTPS, exposing MinIO ports to the internet without a firewall or reverse proxy.

Consequences: Data leakage, unauthorized access, ability to modify or delete objects, compromise of the entire system. In 2026, cyberattacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated, and neglecting basic security principles is unacceptable.

How to avoid:

  • Always change the default MINIO_ROOT_USER and MINIO_ROOT_PASSWORD to complex, unique values.
  • Use HTTPS (SSL/TLS) for all traffic to MinIO.
  • Configure firewalls (ufw, iptables) to restrict access only to necessary ports and IP addresses.
  • Use MinIO IAM to create separate users with minimally required privileges (principle of least privilege).
  • Do not expose MinIO ports (9000, 9001) directly to the internet; use a reverse proxy (Nginx, HAProxy) with SSL termination.

5. Insufficient Monitoring and Logging

Mistake: Lack of a monitoring system for MinIO and the underlying infrastructure, ignoring logs.

Consequences: Inability to promptly detect problems (disk overflow, node failure, network issues, performance degradation). Problems can accumulate and lead to a large-scale outage, data loss, or prolonged downtime. Lack of centralized logging complicates debugging and incident investigation.

How to avoid:

  • Deploy Prometheus and Grafana to collect and visualize MinIO metrics, as well as OS metrics (CPU, RAM, disk, network).
  • Configure alerts (via Alertmanager) for critical events (e.g., disk failure, high error rate, node unavailability).
  • Use a centralized logging system (ELK Stack, Loki) to aggregate MinIO logs and system logs from all nodes.
  • Regularly review monitoring dashboards and logs.

6. Using MinIO Without a Load Balancer for Clients

Mistake: Direct client connection to one of the MinIO nodes or using Round Robin DNS without considering node health.

Consequences: Uneven load distribution, a single point of failure at the access level, availability issues for clients if the node they are directly connected to goes down. Although MinIO is a distributed system, clients need a single "entry point".

How to avoid:

  • Use an external load balancer (HAProxy, Nginx, cloud LB) in front of the MinIO cluster. It will distribute requests among nodes and redirect traffic to healthy nodes in case of a failure.
  • Configure health checks on the load balancer for MinIO ports.
  • If using Round Robin DNS, ensure it is dynamic and can exclude unhealthy nodes, or use it only in conjunction with a load balancer.

7. Incorrect Network Configuration Between Nodes

Mistake: Insufficient network bandwidth, high latency between nodes, ports blocked by firewalls.

Consequences: Significant reduction in cluster performance, especially during write and data recovery operations (rebalancing, healing). Erasure coding requires intensive network interaction between nodes. High latency can lead to timeouts and instability.

How to avoid:

  • Use a high-speed network (10GbE or higher) for traffic between MinIO nodes.
  • Place nodes within the same local network or in geographically close data centers with low latency (no more than 1-2 ms).
  • Ensure that firewalls allow TCP traffic between all cluster nodes on the MinIO port (default 9000), as well as on the console port (9001, if used).

By avoiding these common mistakes, you will significantly increase the chances of a successful and stable deployment of a fault-tolerant S3 storage based on MinIO.

Checklist for Practical MinIO Implementation

This checklist will help you ensure that you have considered all important aspects when planning, deploying, and operating a fault-tolerant MinIO cluster.

  1. Infrastructure Planning:
    • Is the target storage volume and expected load (IOPS, bandwidth) defined?
    • Is a sufficient number of nodes (minimum 4) and disks (minimum 4 NVMe/SSD per node) selected?
    • Is sufficient network bandwidth (10GbE+) provided between nodes and to clients?
    • Are VPS/Dedicated servers selected from different providers or in different availability zones/racks?
    • Is the IP addressing plan and DNS records for the cluster planned?
  2. Operating System Preparation (on each node):
    • Is the current LTS version of the OS installed (e.g., Ubuntu 24.04)?
    • Is the OS updated to the latest version?
    • Is SWAP disabled?
    • Is time synchronization (NTP) configured?
    • Is a separate minio user created to run the service?
    • Are directories for MinIO data created (e.g., /mnt/data{1..4}) and are access rights configured for the minio user?
    • Is the firewall (UFW/iptables) configured to allow MinIO traffic (ports 9000, 9001) between nodes and from clients?
  3. MinIO Installation and Configuration (on each node):
    • Is the MinIO binary downloaded and installed to /usr/local/bin/minio?
    • Is the /etc/minio/minio.env file created with MINIO_ROOT_USER, MINIO_ROOT_PASSWORD, and MINIO_VOLUMES?
    • Are complex and unique credentials set for MINIO_ROOT_USER?
    • Are all paths to disks/directories and node addresses correctly specified in MINIO_VOLUMES?
    • Is the system service /etc/systemd/system/minio.service created and configured?
    • Is the MinIO service enabled and running? Is its status checked (systemctl status minio)?
  4. Network Access and Security Configuration:
    • Is DNS (A-record) configured for MinIO cluster access (e.g., minio.yourdomain.com)?
    • Is a reverse proxy/load balancer (Nginx, HAProxy) deployed in front of the cluster?
    • Is SSL/TLS (Let's Encrypt) configured for HTTPS access to MinIO?
    • Is access to the MinIO console (port 9001) restricted to administrators only?
    • Are separate MinIO IAM users created with minimally required access policies for applications?
    • Are MINIO_ROOT_USER rights removed or severely restricted after initial setup?
  5. Monitoring and Logging:
    • Are Prometheus and Grafana deployed for monitoring MinIO and the underlying infrastructure?
    • Are Grafana dashboards configured to visualize MinIO metrics (IOPS, bandwidth, disk status, node status, bucket status)?
    • Are alerts configured in Alertmanager for critical MinIO events?
    • Is MinIO log rotation (logrotate) configured?
    • Are MinIO logs sent to a centralized logging system (ELK Stack, Loki)?
  6. Backup and Recovery:
    • Is a backup plan developed for critical data in MinIO?
    • Are automated tasks configured to mirror MinIO buckets to another reliable location?
    • Have test data recoveries been performed to verify backup functionality?
  7. Maintenance and Updates:
    • Is a process developed for regularly updating MinIO to the latest versions?
    • Is there an action plan in case of a node or disk failure?
    • Is all configuration and procedures documented?
  8. Testing:
    • Has load testing been performed on the MinIO cluster?
    • Has fault tolerance been verified by simulating a disk or node failure?
    • Has compatibility with client applications using the S3 API been verified?

Cost Calculation and Economics of MinIO Ownership

Diagram: Cost Calculation and Economics of MinIO Ownership
Diagram: Cost Calculation and Economics of MinIO Ownership

One of the key drivers for choosing MinIO over cloud solutions is cost savings. However, it's important to understand that "free" does not mean "cost-free." Here, we will look at calculation examples and hidden costs relevant for 2026.

1. Calculation Model: MinIO Self-Hosted vs. AWS S3 Comparison

Let's compare the total cost of ownership for a hypothetical SaaS project that stores 100 TB of data and generates 10 TB of egress traffic per month. Assume a moderate number of requests (100 million GET requests and 10 million PUT requests per month).

Scenario 1: AWS S3 Standard (eu-central-1 region, 2026 forecast)

  • Storage: 100 TB 0.023 USD/GB/month = 100 1024 0.023 = ~2355 USD/month
  • Egress Traffic:
    • First 1 TB: 0.090 USD/GB (or less, depends on region)
    • Next 9 TB: 9 1024 0.085 USD/GB = ~780 USD/month (forecast)
    • Total traffic: 1 1024 0.090 + 9 1024 0.085 = ~92 + 783 = ~875 USD/month
  • Requests:
    • 100 million GET requests: 100 0.0004 USD/1000 requests = 40 USD/month
    • 10 million PUT requests: 10 0.005 USD/1000 requests = 50 USD/month
  • Total AWS S3 Cost: 2355 + 875 + 40 + 50 = ~3320 USD/month

Scenario 2: MinIO Self-Hosted on Dedicated Servers (2026 forecast)

For 100 TB, we would need, for example, 8 dedicated servers, each with 8 NVMe SSDs of 4 TB. This would provide 8 8 4 = 256 TB of raw capacity. Considering erasure coding (e.g., EC:8/4, which yields 50% usable capacity), we would get 128 TB of usable capacity, which is sufficient for 100 TB of data.

  • Server Cost (8 units):
    • Each server: Intel Xeon E-23xx/E-24xx, 64 GB RAM, 8x4TB NVMe SSD, 10GbE.
    • Approximate cost of dedicated server rental in 2026: ~150-200 USD/month/server.
    • Total: 8 175 USD/month = 1400 USD/month
  • Egress Traffic Cost:
    • Many dedicated server providers include up to 10-20 TB of traffic for free or offer very low rates (0-5 USD per TB).
    • Assume 10 TB at 5 USD/TB: 10 5 = 50 USD/month
  • Administration Cost:
    • This is a hidden but significant expense. Assume 0.25 FTE (Full-Time Equivalent) DevOps engineer for support.
    • Average DevOps engineer salary in 2026: ~6000 USD/month.
    • Total: 0.25 6000 = 1500 USD/month (could be less if the team is already in place and MinIO is not the primary task).
  • Total MinIO Self-Hosted Cost: 1400 (servers) + 50 (traffic) + 1500 (administration) = ~2950 USD/month

Cost Comparison Summary Table (2026 forecast)

Parameter AWS S3 Standard MinIO Self-Hosted
Storage (100 TB) ~2355 USD/month Included in server cost
Egress Traffic (10 TB) ~875 USD/month ~50 USD/month
Requests (100M GET, 10M PUT) ~90 USD/month Included in server cost
Administration ~0 USD (managed service) ~1500 USD/month
Total Monthly Cost ~3320 USD/month ~2950 USD/month
Annual Savings MinIO vs AWS S3 - (3320 - 2950) 12 = ~4440 USD/year

Note: Calculations are approximate. Actual prices may vary.

In this scenario, even considering administration costs, MinIO proves to be cheaper. With less traffic, cloud providers might be more competitive, but as volumes and traffic grow, MinIO quickly pulls ahead.

2. Hidden Costs

When calculating the TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) for MinIO, do not forget the following hidden costs:

  • Human Resources: Your team's time for deployment, configuration, monitoring, upgrades, and troubleshooting. This is the biggest "hidden" cost.
  • Licenses (optional): While MinIO itself is open-source, some monitoring, backup, or security tools might be proprietary.
  • Backup: Cost of additional storage for MinIO backups.
  • Power and Cooling: If you host servers in your own data center. For VPS/Dedicated, this is usually included in the cost.
  • Network Equipment: For dedicated servers, purchasing or renting network switches and load balancers might be necessary.
  • Training: Investment in training the team to work with MinIO and related technologies.
  • SSL Certificates: While Let's Encrypt is free, paid EV certificates might be required for corporate needs.

3. How to Optimize Costs

  • Provider Selection: Carefully choose your VPS/Dedicated provider. Compare not only server costs but also traffic rates, availability of NVMe drives, network quality, and support.
  • Erasure Coding Optimization: Choose the optimal EC coefficient. For example, EC:N/4 (where N is the number of drives) provides better disk space utilization (75% usable) with lower fault tolerance (can withstand 3 drive failures). Balance between fault tolerance and capacity.
  • Using Denser Servers: Instead of many small servers, consider a few powerful ones with a large number of drives. This can reduce CPU/RAM costs per unit of storage and simplify management.
  • Automation: Investments in automation (Ansible, Terraform) pay off by reducing labor costs for deployment and maintenance.
  • Resource Monitoring: Continuous monitoring helps identify inefficient resource usage and optimize configuration.
  • Data Lifecycle Planning: For rarely accessed data, consider moving it to cheaper storage classes or archiving it. MinIO supports lifecycle policies, but additional logic is required for their effective use.

Ultimately, MinIO provides a powerful tool for building cost-effective storage. The key to success is careful planning, accounting for all costs, and continuous optimization.

MinIO Use Cases and Examples

Diagram: MinIO Use Cases and Examples
Diagram: MinIO Use Cases and Examples

MinIO is actively used across various industries and for a wide range of tasks. Let's look at a few realistic scenarios demonstrating its advantages.

Case 1: Storage for SaaS Platform Media Content

Project Description: A SaaS platform for managing and delivering video content. Users upload videos, the platform transcodes them into various formats, and provides access for streaming. Data volume is growing rapidly, expected to reach up to 500 TB within a year, with high read frequency (streaming) and periodic write peaks (uploading new videos).

Problem: Using AWS S3 resulted in exorbitant bills for egress traffic (video streaming). Traffic costs exceeded subscription revenues. Complete control over costs and performance was needed.

Solution with MinIO:

  • Architecture: A MinIO cluster of 16 dedicated servers was deployed, each with 8 NVMe SSDs of 8 TB and 25GbE network cards. Servers are located in two geographically dispersed data centers (8+8 nodes) for maximum fault tolerance and reduced latency for different regions. An active-active mode was used with synchronous metadata replication and asynchronous object replication between MinIO clusters.
  • Fault Tolerance: Erasure Coding EC:16/8 on each cluster, providing 50% usable capacity and the ability to withstand the failure of up to 7 nodes/disks.
  • Access: HAProxy is installed in front of each cluster for load balancing and SSL termination. A CDN (Content Delivery Network) is used to cache the most popular videos, reducing direct load on MinIO and further optimizing traffic.
  • Integration: Backend services (Python/Node.js) use the MinIO SDK for uploading/downloading files. The transcoding service retrieves videos from MinIO, processes them, and saves the results back.

Results:

  • Savings: 70% reduction in monthly storage and traffic costs compared to AWS S3.
  • Performance: Increased video upload and streaming speed due to server proximity to users and optimized network infrastructure.
  • Control: Full control over data and infrastructure, which allowed for the implementation of specific security and audit requirements.
  • Scalability: Ability to easily add new nodes as data volume grows.

Case 2: Storage for Corporate Data Center Backups and Archives

Project Description: A large company with its own data center needs a reliable and cost-effective solution for storing backups of virtual machines, databases, and file servers. The backup volume is about 200 TB, with a monthly increase of 10-15 TB. Access to backups is rarely required, but fast in case of recovery.

Problem: Using traditional NAS/SAN solutions was too expensive and complex to manage for such volumes. Cloud backups were rejected due to regulatory data residency requirements and high recovery costs (egress fees).

Solution with MinIO:

  • Architecture: A MinIO cluster of 12 dedicated servers was deployed within the corporate data center, each with 12 SATA SSDs of 10 TB (for cost and capacity balance) and 10GbE network cards.
  • Fault Tolerance: Erasure Coding EC:12/6, providing 50% usable capacity and the ability to withstand the failure of up to 5 disks/nodes.
  • Integration: Veeam Backup & Replication, Bacula, and other backup systems that support S3-compatible storage as a target are used.
  • Security: The MinIO cluster is located in an isolated network, with access strictly limited via firewalls. All data is encrypted client-side before being uploaded to MinIO, and MinIO also uses encryption at rest.
  • Monitoring: Integration with Prometheus and Grafana for monitoring cluster status, with alerts configured for any anomalies or disk failures.

Results:

  • Savings: Significant reduction in capital and operational costs compared to proprietary NAS/SAN solutions.
  • Compliance: Adherence to regulatory data residency requirements.
  • Reliability: High fault tolerance and data durability thanks to erasure coding.
  • Simplicity: Simplified backup storage management through the use of the standard S3 API.
  • Recovery Speed: Fast data access when recovery is needed.

Case 3: Local Storage for AI/ML Model Development and Testing

Project Description: A team of Data Scientists develops and tests AI/ML models that require access to large datasets (tens of terabytes). Data changes frequently, and models are retrained, requiring fast access to storage. The project is in an active development phase, and cloud storage and traffic costs for frequent iterations were becoming too high.

Problem: Cloud services were expensive for frequent read/write operations and repeated downloads of the same data. Fast prototyping without the latencies inherent to the public internet was also required.

Solution with MinIO:

  • Architecture: A small MinIO cluster of 4 powerful VPS with NVMe disks was deployed within a single private cloud provider. Each VPS has 4 NVMe SSDs of 2 TB.
  • Fault Tolerance: Erasure Coding EC:4/2, providing 50% usable capacity and the ability to withstand the failure of 1 node/disk.
  • Integration: Models (Python, TensorFlow/PyTorch) use the S3 SDK to upload/download datasets and training results. The Kubernetes cluster, where training jobs are run, is integrated with MinIO.
  • Performance: Due to local deployment and high-speed private network, very low latencies and high throughput are achieved.

Results:

  • Cost Reduction: Significant savings on traffic and storage compared to cloud alternatives.
  • Accelerated Development: Faster data access allowed for shorter iteration cycles in model development.
  • Flexibility: Ability to quickly create and delete buckets for various experiments, full control over data access and versions.
  • Scalability: Easy scaling of the cluster as storage needs grow.

These cases demonstrate MinIO's versatility and its ability to solve a wide range of problems, while offering significant economic and operational advantages.

Tools and Resources for Working with MinIO

Diagram: Tools and Resources for Working with MinIO
Diagram: Tools and Resources for Working with MinIO

For effective work with MinIO, there is a whole arsenal of tools and extensive documentation. In 2026, the MinIO ecosystem continues to actively evolve.

1. Utilities for Working with MinIO

  • mc (MinIO Client):

    The official command-line client for MinIO. This is your primary tool for managing buckets, objects, users, IAM policies, data mirroring, and much more. Fully compatible with S3 API.

    
    # Add a host
    mc alias set myminio https://minio.yourdomain.com MINIO_ROOT_USER MINIO_ROOT_PASSWORD
    
    # Create a bucket
    mc mb myminio/mybucket
    
    # Upload a file
    mc cp mylocalfile.txt myminio/mybucket/
    
    # List objects
    mc ls myminio/mybucket/
    
    # Mirror (synchronize) a directory
    mc mirror /path/to/local/data myminio/mybucket/
    
  • MinIO Console (Web UI):

    A web interface for managing MinIO. It allows you to visually browse buckets, objects, manage users and policies, and monitor basic metrics. Accessible at https://minio.yourdomain.com:9001 (or via Nginx/HAProxy).

  • AWS CLI (with MinIO profile):

    Since MinIO is fully S3-compatible, you can use the official AWS CLI by configuring it to work with your MinIO cluster.

    
    # Configure profile for MinIO
    aws configure --profile minio
    AWS Access Key ID [None]: MINIO_ACCESS_KEY
    AWS Secret Access Key [None]: MINIO_SECRET_KEY
    Default region name [None]: us-east-1 # Можно указать любой
    Default output format [None]: json
    
    # Use AWS CLI with MinIO
    aws --endpoint-url https://minio.yourdomain.com:9000 --profile minio s3 ls
    aws --endpoint-url https://minio.yourdomain.com:9000 --profile minio s3 mb s3://new-bucket
    
  • S3 SDKs:

    Any S3-compatible SDKs for programming languages (Python Boto3, Java SDK, Go SDK, Node.js SDK, etc.) can be used to interact with MinIO by simply specifying the endpoint_url to your MinIO cluster.

2. Monitoring and Testing

  • Prometheus:

    An open-source monitoring system. MinIO exports metrics in Prometheus format, allowing easy collection of data on performance, disk status, nodes, buckets, and other aspects of the cluster.

    
    # Example Prometheus configuration for MinIO
    - job_name: 'minio'
      scrape_interval: 15s
      static_configs:
        - targets: ['node1.yourdomain.com:9000', 'node2.yourdomain.com:9000'] # IP/hostname of your MinIO nodes
          labels:
            instance: minio-cluster
      metrics_path: /minio/v2/metrics/cluster
      scheme: http # Or https, if MinIO itself terminates SSL
    
  • Grafana:

    A data visualization platform. Used with Prometheus to create dashboards displaying MinIO's real-time status and performance. MinIO provides ready-made dashboard templates for Grafana.

  • Alertmanager:

    A Prometheus component for processing and routing alerts. Configure it to send notifications (email, Slack, Telegram) when critical events occur in MinIO (e.g., disk failure, high error rate).

  • Hey (HTTP benchmarking tool):

    A simple yet powerful tool for load testing HTTP services, including MinIO. Helps evaluate throughput and IOPS.

    
    # Example: 10000 requests with 50 concurrent connections
    hey -n 10000 -c 50 https://minio.yourdomain.com/mybucket/testfile.bin
    
  • MinIO Healthcheck:

    Check MinIO status via /minio/health/live and /minio/health/ready endpoints, which can be used by load balancers.

3. Useful Links and Documentation

Using these tools and resources will significantly simplify the deployment, management, and monitoring of your resilient MinIO cluster, allowing your team to focus on project development rather than struggling with infrastructure.

Troubleshooting: MinIO Problem Solving

Diagram: Troubleshooting: MinIO Problem Solving
Diagram: Troubleshooting: MinIO Problem Solving

Even with careful planning and deployment, problems can arise. Here are typical scenarios and approaches to solving them.

1. MinIO does not start or is inaccessible

  • Problem: The MinIO service does not start, or you cannot access it over the network.
  • Diagnosis:
    
    sudo systemctl status minio # Check service status
    journalctl -u minio.service -f # View service logs in real time
    netstat -tulnp | grep 9000 # Check if MinIO is listening on port 9000
    curl -v http://localhost:9000/minio/health/live # Check healthcheck availability
    
  • Possible causes and solutions:
    • Error in minio.env or minio.service: Carefully check syntax, paths, and access rights. Often, the error is in MINIO_VOLUMES (incorrect IPs, paths, ports).
    • Port in use: Port 9000 (or 9001) is already in use by another process. Change the MinIO port or stop the conflicting process.
    • Disk/path issues: MinIO cannot access the specified data directories. Check access rights (the minio user must be the owner), ensure that the directories exist.
    • Network/firewall issues: The firewall is blocking the MinIO port. Check ufw status or iptables -L. Ensure that ports are open between cluster nodes and for clients.
    • Insufficient resources: Lack of RAM or CPU. Check htop or top.

2. Data Consistency or Erasure Coding Issues

  • Problem: MinIO reports Erasure Coding errors, data corruption, or unavailability of some objects.
  • Diagnosis:
    
    mc admin info myminio # General cluster information
    mc admin heal myminio # Start self-healing process (if MinIO does not do it automatically)
    mc admin trace myminio # Monitor operations in real time
    
  • Possible causes and solutions:
    • Disk/node failure: One or more disks/nodes have failed. MinIO will automatically attempt to recover data if there is sufficient redundancy. Replace faulty hardware.
    • Time drift (NTP): Check time synchronization on all nodes. Desynchronization can lead to consistency problems.
    • Network problems: High latency or packet loss between nodes. Check network connection (ping, mtr).
    • Metadata corruption: Rare, but can happen. Use mc admin heal to attempt recovery. In extreme cases, recovery from backup will be required.

3. Low MinIO Performance

  • Problem: Slow read/write speeds, high latencies.
  • Diagnosis:
    
    # System resource monitoring on each node
    htop
    iostat -x 1 # Disk usage
    sar -n DEV 1 # Network usage
    

    Check Grafana dashboards if configured.

  • Possible causes and solutions:
    • Network bottleneck: The network is overloaded or has insufficient bandwidth. Consider upgrading to 10/25GbE or optimizing network traffic.
    • Slow disks: Use of HDDs or slow SSDs. NVMe drives significantly improve performance.
    • Insufficient CPU/RAM: MinIO consumes resources. Increase CPU/RAM on the nodes.
    • Suboptimal MinIO configuration: Ensure MinIO is running with the correct flags and environment variables.
    • Client issues: Inefficient use of S3 SDK by clients, too many small requests.

4. IAM and Access Issues

  • Problem: Users cannot access buckets/objects, or receive authentication/authorization errors.
  • Diagnosis:
    
    mc admin user list myminio # Check user list
    mc admin policy list myminio # Check policy list
    mc admin policy get myminio <policy-name> # View specific policy
    mc admin user info myminio <username> # Check policies attached to user
    

    Check MinIO logs for Access Denied or Authentication Failed errors.

  • Possible causes and solutions:
    • Incorrect credentials: The user is using the wrong Access Key or Secret Key.
    • Incorrect policies: The access policy does not grant the necessary permissions. Carefully check Action and Resource in the JSON policy.
    • Typos in buckets/objects: Incorrect bucket names or object prefixes in requests.
    • SSL/TLS issues: If the client cannot establish a secure connection, this may appear as an access problem. Check certificates and HTTPS configuration.

When to contact support or the community

  • If you have exhausted all standard diagnostic and troubleshooting methods.
  • If the problem is related to internal MinIO errors that are not documented.
  • If you have discovered a potential bug in MinIO.
  • For paid support, MinIO Inc. offers enterprise subscriptions with guaranteed SLA.
  • For free assistance, use MinIO GitHub Discussions or Stack Overflow with the MinIO tag.

Effective troubleshooting requires a systematic approach, a good understanding of MinIO architecture, and basic system administration knowledge. Always start with logs and checking the basic infrastructure.

FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions about MinIO

What is MinIO and why is it needed if cloud S3 already exists?

MinIO is a high-performance, distributed, open-source object storage solution fully compatible with the Amazon S3 API. It is needed when cloud S3 becomes too expensive (especially due to egress traffic), when full control over data and infrastructure is required (e.g., due to regulatory requirements), or when maximum performance with minimal latency is necessary within your own network. MinIO allows you to build your own storage "cloud" while maintaining compatibility with the vast S3 ecosystem.

How many nodes are required for a fault-tolerant MinIO cluster?

To activate distributed mode with Erasure Coding and ensure basic fault tolerance, MinIO requires a minimum of 4 nodes (or 4 drives if MinIO is deployed on a single node, but this is not a server-level fault-tolerant configuration). It is recommended to use 4 to 16 nodes. The more nodes, the higher the fault tolerance and performance, provided that the nodes have sufficient drives and a fast network. For example, an 8-node cluster with Erasure Coding EC:8/4 can withstand the failure of up to 3 nodes or drives without data loss.

Can MinIO be used on regular HDD drives?

Yes, MinIO can run on HDD drives, but this will significantly reduce its performance, especially with a large number of small files or intensive read/write operations. MinIO is optimized for fast SSD and NVMe drives, which provide much higher throughput and IOPS. For production environments where performance is critical, SSD or NVMe are strongly recommended. HDDs may be acceptable for archival storage or backups with low speed requirements.

How does MinIO ensure fault tolerance?

MinIO uses an Erasure Coding mechanism (error correction coding) to ensure fault tolerance. Instead of full data replication, which requires a lot of space, Erasure Coding breaks each object into data parts and parity parts. These parts are distributed across different drives and nodes. If some drives or nodes fail, MinIO can reconstruct the original object using the remaining data and parity parts. This ensures high data durability with efficient use of disk space.

Do I need a load balancer in front of MinIO?

Yes, for a production deployment of a fault-tolerant MinIO cluster, it is highly recommended to use an external load balancer (e.g., Nginx, HAProxy, or a cloud Load Balancer). The load balancer distributes client requests among MinIO nodes, ensures high availability (by redirecting traffic to operational nodes in case of failure), and can also terminate SSL/TLS, simplifying MinIO configuration. Without a load balancer, clients would connect directly to one of the nodes, creating a single point of failure.

How to upgrade MinIO without downtime?

MinIO supports "rolling upgrades." This means you can update cluster nodes one by one without interrupting the operation of the entire storage. The process involves downloading the new MinIO binary, stopping the service on one node, replacing the binary, starting the service, and then moving to the next node. Client requests will be temporarily redirected to other operational cluster nodes.

Can MinIO be used for hosting static websites?

Yes, MinIO fully supports static website hosting functionality, similar to AWS S3. You can create a bucket, upload static HTML, CSS, JS, and image files to it, and configure the bucket for web hosting. MinIO allows you to specify an index document (e.g., index.html) and an error document (e.g., 404.html). This is an excellent way to deploy simple websites or single-page applications.

Does MinIO support data encryption?

Yes, MinIO supports data encryption both in transit (using TLS/SSL (HTTPS)) and at rest. For encryption at rest, MinIO can use SSE-S3 (Server-Side Encryption with S3-managed keys), SSE-C (Server-Side Encryption with Customer-Provided Keys), and SSE-KMS (Server-Side Encryption with Key Management Service). This ensures a high level of security for stored data.

How does MinIO compete with Ceph?

MinIO and Ceph are both open-source distributed storage solutions, but they are oriented towards different scenarios. MinIO specializes exclusively in high-performance object storage with S3 compatibility; it is lightweight, simple to deploy and maintain. Ceph is a more versatile and complex system, providing block, file, and object storage, requiring significant resources and deep knowledge for deployment and management. MinIO is often chosen for its simplicity and performance for the specific task of object storage, whereas Ceph is for building a full-fledged software-defined data center.

What are the limitations of MinIO?

MinIO's main limitations are related to its niche specialization: it provides only object storage, not directly offering block devices or file systems. Although it is scalable, the maximum cluster size (number of nodes) may be limited by practical manageability. For very specific or extremely large installations (exabytes), specialized solutions might be required. Also, like any self-hosted system, MinIO requires resources for administration and support, unlike fully managed cloud services.

How to configure object lifecycle policies in MinIO?

MinIO supports object lifecycle policies (Lifecycle Management), similar to AWS S3. These policies allow automatic management of objects in a bucket, for example, deleting them after a certain period or moving them to other storage classes (although MinIO itself does not have different storage classes, this can be achieved through mirroring to another MinIO or external storage). Policies are configured using an XML file and applied to the bucket via the mc CLI or S3 API.


<LifecycleConfiguration>
    <Rule>
        <ID>DeleteOldLogs</ID>
        <Filter>
            <Prefix>logs/</Prefix>
        </Filter>
        <Status>Enabled</Status>
        <Expiration>
            <Days>30</Days>
        </Expiration>
    </Rule>
</LifecycleConfiguration>

mc ls set myminio/mybucket lifecycle-config.xml

What are the high availability options for MinIO Console?

MinIO Console (web interface) by default runs on a separate port (9001). To ensure its high availability in a distributed cluster, you can use several approaches:

  1. Nginx/HAProxy on each node: Configure a local reverse proxy (Nginx) on each node that will direct requests to the local MinIO console. Then use DNS Round Robin or an external load balancer to distribute traffic among these proxies.
  2. Separate load balancer: Deploy a separate load balancer (HAProxy, Nginx) in front of all MinIO nodes, which will direct requests to the MinIO Console to any of the operational nodes.
  3. Kubernetes Ingress: If MinIO is deployed in Kubernetes, use an Ingress controller to route traffic to the MinIO Console.
It is important that the console remains accessible even if individual nodes fail, as it is a key tool for administration.

Conclusion

In 2026, as cost-effectiveness and data control come to the forefront, MinIO becomes not just an alternative to cloud storage, but a strategically important infrastructure component for many companies. This comprehensive guide has demonstrated that building a fault-tolerant S3-compatible storage on VPS or dedicated servers using MinIO is not only possible but also highly beneficial, especially for projects with large data volumes and intensive traffic.

We have covered everything from understanding the fundamental criteria for choosing storage to a detailed overview of MinIO and its competitors, step-by-step deployment instructions, common pitfalls to avoid, and cost optimization methods. Real-world case studies have shown how MinIO solves specific business challenges, and the Troubleshooting section has equipped you with the knowledge to quickly resolve potential issues.

Personal experience with MinIO implementation in various projects confirms its reliability, performance, and flexibility. This solution allows you to regain control over critical data, avoid vendor lock-in, and significantly reduce operational costs without sacrificing availability and scalability. Yes, it requires certain investments in knowledge and administration, but these investments pay off handsomely.

Final Recommendations

  • Plan for scale: Always start with an architecture capable of horizontal scaling. A minimum of 4 nodes for a production cluster.
  • Invest in NVMe: For maximum MinIO performance, NVMe drives are the standard for 2026.
  • Automate: Use Ansible, Terraform, Kubernetes for deployment and management to minimize manual errors and accelerate operations.
  • Monitor relentlessly: Prometheus, Grafana, Alertmanager are your best friends for ensuring stable operation and quick incident response.
  • Security above all: HTTPS, strict IAM policies, firewalls, and data encryption must be configured from day one.
  • Don't forget TCO: Include administration costs in your calculations. Savings on cloud bills can be huge, but require your own resources.

Next Steps for the Reader

  1. Start small: Deploy a test MinIO cluster on a few VPS instances to familiarize yourself with its functionality and understand its operating principles.
  2. Study the documentation: The official MinIO documentation is very extensive and up-to-date.
  3. Conduct load testing: Evaluate MinIO's performance in your infrastructure with your specific load patterns.
  4. Integrate with your applications: Use the S3 SDK to connect your backend services to MinIO.
  5. Build a full CI/CD pipeline: Automate MinIO deployment and updates in production.

The world of on-premises object storage is a world of flexibility, control, and savings. MinIO provides all the necessary tools to make this world accessible for your project. Good luck building your fault-tolerant S3 storage!

Was this guide helpful?

Building Fault-Tolerant S3-Compatible Storage on VPS/Dedicated: Complete